“Judy Wilyman is a Ph.D student in environmental science at Murdoch University. Her supervisor is the Peter Dingle controversial, eccentric. His wife Penelope Dingle died of bowel cancer after allegedly “the Dingles had a pact with the homeopath treating Dingle, Francine Scrayen. Under the pact, they agreed that only alternative medicine would be used and Dr Dingle would then write a book about curing his wife’s cancer.” The State Coroner is investigating her death.”

So Judy Wilyman has negligible qualifications, is neither working in the medical or biochemical area, and is supervised by someone with a seriously eccentric approach. See the first link for more about what she has said previously.

I wonder what she thinks about the Moletech Fuel Saver?

It’s not proven that trees aren’t causing chronic illness – or wild energy released from opened bottles of homeopathic pills. Maybe if all those alt-pharma people, especially reiki masters, stopped messing with cosmic forces, chronic illness would go away forever. Is anyone researching this possibility? Why not?

What chronic illnesses is she talking about and does she have proof there’s even cause for panic?

How did you contain yourself, omg

“You get better community protection if you don’t vaccinate for a disease – you won’t find evidence that lack of vaccination is harmful if you are not looking and she says the government isn’t looking.”

I love this one yes and we will all die the ones that are not dead might be immune.

“vaccination is not the main reason for decline in infectious diseases ”

Operates in conjunction with hygiene and nutrition. Where are the anti-nutritionists? Where are the anti-hygienists? Oh, wait. Meryl questions germ theory, so I guess we know where some of the anti-hygienists are.

“it is not prove that ingredients in vaccines are not causing the chronic illness in our kids”

Two “nots” there. Someone should tell her about the fallacy of proving a negative. Frankly, the point is to prove harm, not disprove it.

“no disease has been eradicated by herd immunity”

Errr… small-fucking-pox? Again, one of those “in conjunction with” half-lies

“Therefore says that there is precautionary principle”

not sure where this is heading from, but I find *using* vaccines to be precautionary. wuh?

“We can no longer state is its for the community good when so many vaccinations are being used”

Non-sequiteur. Needs some serious backing up.

“This procedure is for healthy individuals”

Well yeah. If you’re already infected, a vaccine will do jack

“You get better community protection if you don’t vaccinate for a disease ”

Well, you might get the emergence of strongly-resistant individuals. At the cost of how many needless deaths?

“least three times that vaccinations contain mercury”

Only multi-dose flu vaccines, IIRC, with optional single-dose. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.

J