<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy And Ethics &#8211; Teaching Critical Thinking In Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podblack.com/2009/11/philosophy-and-ethics-teaching-critical-thinking-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podblack.com/2009/11/philosophy-and-ethics-teaching-critical-thinking-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Science, Superstitions and Skeptical Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 19:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cock for Asclepius</title>
		<link>http://podblack.com/2009/11/philosophy-and-ethics-teaching-critical-thinking-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-45511</link>
		<dc:creator>Cock for Asclepius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podblack.com/?p=1739#comment-45511</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve met skeptics who frown on &quot;philosophy&quot; for not being practical. I point out that the philosophy of ethics is very practical, and they sometimes still scoff. Without mystical forces guiding and punishing us for our acts, the &quot;philosophy of ethics&quot; is the most accurate phrase to describe how skeptics determine their moral code. I think they just don&#039;t like the word &quot;philosophy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve met skeptics who frown on &#8220;philosophy&#8221; for not being practical. I point out that the philosophy of ethics is very practical, and they sometimes still scoff. Without mystical forces guiding and punishing us for our acts, the &#8220;philosophy of ethics&#8221; is the most accurate phrase to describe how skeptics determine their moral code. I think they just don&#8217;t like the word &#8220;philosophy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: podblack</title>
		<link>http://podblack.com/2009/11/philosophy-and-ethics-teaching-critical-thinking-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-45507</link>
		<dc:creator>podblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podblack.com/?p=1739#comment-45507</guid>
		<description>Every bit helps, I&#039;d say. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every bit helps, I&#8217;d say. <img src='http://podblack.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyD</title>
		<link>http://podblack.com/2009/11/philosophy-and-ethics-teaching-critical-thinking-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-45505</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podblack.com/?p=1739#comment-45505</guid>
		<description>Fascinating. Does this mean we&#039;re winning, slowly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating. Does this mean we&#8217;re winning, slowly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

