<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silver Screen Science-Slip-Ups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podblack.com/2008/02/silver-screen-science-slip-ups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podblack.com/2008/02/silver-screen-science-slip-ups/</link>
	<description>Science, Superstitions and Skeptical Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 19:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Send In The Clones - Films And Science &#171; PodBlack Blog</title>
		<link>http://podblack.com/2008/02/silver-screen-science-slip-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Send In The Clones - Films And Science &#171; PodBlack Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podblack.wordpress.com/?p=316#comment-267</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8216;Five Science Fiction Movies That Get The Science Right&#8217; - earlier I blogged about the fantastic lecture I attended by Biotechnology Australia, who did a study on the influence that films have on attitudes towards biotechnology (seems everyone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8216;Five Science Fiction Movies That Get The Science Right&#8217; &#8211; earlier I blogged about the fantastic lecture I attended by Biotechnology Australia, who did a study on the influence that films have on attitudes towards biotechnology (seems everyone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Stacey</title>
		<link>http://podblack.com/2008/02/silver-screen-science-slip-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podblack.wordpress.com/?p=316#comment-266</guid>
		<description>That &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; article has a few entertaining science gaffes of its own:  photons do not just &quot;transmit&quot; light, they &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; light; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunclipse.org/?p=509&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you don&#039;t factor prime numbers&lt;/a&gt;.

Funnily enough, I saw &lt;i&gt;Sunshine&lt;/i&gt; a few weeks ago in the same lecture hall where that &lt;i&gt;Jumper&lt;/i&gt; discussion took place &#8212; it was one of the flicks in this year&#039;s MIT Science Fiction Marathon.  I sat in the front row with some friends who&#039;d brought liquor to shoot every time the science turned stupid.  My impression of the movie?  Well, it&#039;s all kind of fuzzy. . . .  The biggest problem I had, however, was not with a particular technical detail, but rather with an attitude:  when you send a mission into space in order to save the Earth, you should crew it with &lt;i&gt;astronauts&lt;/i&gt; instead of &lt;i&gt;actors.&lt;/i&gt;  Trained professionals would not have a mission where only one man knows how the payload they&#039;re supposed to deliver actually works, trained professionals would not let a critical mission maneuver depend upon one guy&#039;s arithmetic, etc., etc.  To adopt a comparison made by &lt;a href=&quot;http://metamagician3000.blogspot.com/2007/12/new-article-in-colloquy.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Russell Blackford&lt;/a&gt;, they sent the crew from the &lt;i&gt;Rama&lt;/i&gt; sequels instead of the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That <i>New York Times</i> article has a few entertaining science gaffes of its own:  photons do not just &#8220;transmit&#8221; light, they <i>are</i> light; and <a href="http://www.sunclipse.org/?p=509" rel="nofollow">you don&#8217;t factor prime numbers</a>.</p>
<p>Funnily enough, I saw <i>Sunshine</i> a few weeks ago in the same lecture hall where that <i>Jumper</i> discussion took place &mdash; it was one of the flicks in this year&#8217;s MIT Science Fiction Marathon.  I sat in the front row with some friends who&#8217;d brought liquor to shoot every time the science turned stupid.  My impression of the movie?  Well, it&#8217;s all kind of fuzzy. . . .  The biggest problem I had, however, was not with a particular technical detail, but rather with an attitude:  when you send a mission into space in order to save the Earth, you should crew it with <i>astronauts</i> instead of <i>actors.</i>  Trained professionals would not have a mission where only one man knows how the payload they&#8217;re supposed to deliver actually works, trained professionals would not let a critical mission maneuver depend upon one guy&#8217;s arithmetic, etc., etc.  To adopt a comparison made by <a href="http://metamagician3000.blogspot.com/2007/12/new-article-in-colloquy.html" rel="nofollow">Russell Blackford</a>, they sent the crew from the <i>Rama</i> sequels instead of the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

