Isaac Asimov (c. January 2, 1920 – April 6, 1992)… was a Russian-born American author and
professor of biochemistry, a highly successful writer, best known for his works of science fiction and for his popular science books. Most of Asimov’s popularized science books explain scientific concepts in a historical way, going as far back as possible to a time when the science in question was at its simplest stage.
…Asimov was one of the most prolific writers of all time, having written or edited more than 500 books and an estimated 9,000 letters and postcards. His works have been published in nine of the ten major categories of the Dewey Decimal System (the sole exception being the 100s; philosophy and psychology).
…Isaac Asimov was a Humanist and a rationalist. He did not oppose religious conviction in others, but he frequently railed against superstitious and pseudoscientific beliefs that tried to pass themselves off as genuine science. - Wikipedia.
I’m a day late to celebrate it, I know! It was yesterday! But better late than never - I just didn’t want to let it go unmentioned, when it so beautifully linked with a request I got for reading advice.
I once tested as to whether I could really find Asimov’s books in nearly every section of the Dewey categories; I was a student who had access to half-a-dozen different libraries. These included Woodvale, Subiaco, Claremont, Fremantle, Tuart Hill and the one off Ocean Beach Road for which I can’t remember the suburb (but it was near the vet I quite liked and was the earliest library I could remember). It seemed fairly true that you could find his books everywhere in every section - although I didn’t end up using his investigations on Shakespeare for a class on British Writers, because the professor I had looked down upon ’science fiction rubbish’.
‘Science Fiction rubbish’ wasn’t an uncommon epithet when I was younger. Now we have the likes of sites like i09, claiming ‘2008: The Year Science Fiction Became Science Culture’:
Acclaimed scifi author William Gibson has already explained it in interviews about his latest novels, all of which read like literary science fiction but take place in the present day. He believes that the present has become so saturated by high tech and advanced science that we are effectively living in a science fictional era.
Gibson is asserting that what once seemed futuristic is now part of the present. But it would be more accurate to say that we now accept scientific speculation as part of everyday life. We haven’t lost the idea of a future that’s way freakier than today. It’s just that now everybody thinks about the freaky future, not just scifi fans.
…Perhaps we have finally reached the apotheosis of a revolution that began centuries ago with thinkers like Galileo and Newton. At last, science has broken free of the laboratories and universities to become a part of everybody’s common culture.
Depite the contribution of science fiction to pop-culture, common culture (and as the article goes on to claim, political nods with the recent US elections), et al., it’s still an issue to get young people into science and skepticism. I was very flattered to get this request from a reader:
btw any ideas how to get a 13 year old interested in science and skepticism?? I got my brother “Science is Golden” by Dr Karl for Newtonmas but I think I vastly underestimated just how apathetic he is towards the subject. He’s into computer games, sport and little else.
[click to continue…]